Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science (French: Impostures Intellectuelles), published in the UK as Intellectual Impostures, is a. French Wikipedia. Fashionable Nonsense (English). 1 reference. imported from Wikimedia project · English Wikipedia. Imposturas intelectuales (Spanish). Más allá de las imposturas intelectuales: ciencia, filosofía y cultura (Transiciones ) | Alan Sokal, Miguel Candel | ISBN: | Kostenloser Versand.
|Published (Last):||15 November 2004|
|PDF File Size:||10.16 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||6.15 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Sokal does a good job of laying out this argument for science, in a careful way that is just as respectful as one should be.
Elvis rated it it was amazing Jan 25, Amazon Second Chance Pass it on, trade it in, give it a second life. Retrieved from ” https: The book had mixed reviews, with some lauding the effort, some more reserved, and others pointing out alleged inconsistencies and criticizing the authors for ignorance of the fields under attack and taking passages out of context.
Rather, they aim to draw attention to the abuse of concepts from mathematics and physics, subjects they’ve devoted their careers to studying and teaching. Very funny and important. He takes Sokal and Bricmont to task for elevating a disagreement with Lacan’s choice of writing styles to an intelectualrs on his thought, which, in Fink’s assessment, they fail to understand. As one of my housemates pointed out to me, it’s everything I hate, in one book!
Page 1 of 1 Start over Page 1 of 1. Archived from the original on Impoaturas 12, Curious to see whether the then-non-peer-reviewed postmodern cultural studies journal Social Text published by Duke University Press would publish a submission which “flattered the editors’ ideological preconceptions,” Sokal submitted a grand-sounding but completely nonsensical paper entitled “Transgressing the Boundaries: He also co-authored a book on quantum triviality.
Paperbackpages. English Choose a language for shopping. Or that DDT should be banned? Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science. Share your thoughts with other customers. He calls it ridiculous and weird that there are intensities of treatment by the scientists, in particular, intelectiales he was “much less badly treated,” when in fact he was the main target of the US press.
The book has been criticized by post-modern philosophers and by scholars with some interest in continental philosophy.
He replied to leftist and postmodernist criticism of the deception by saying that his motivation had been to “defend the Left from a trendy segment of itself. Contemporary Cultural Theory 3rd ed.
File:Sokal Alan Bricmont Jean Imposturas – Monoskop
However, with regard to the second sense, which Plotnisky describes by stating that “all imaginary and complex numbers are, by definition, irrational,”  mathematicians agree with Sokal and Bricmont in not taking complex numbers as irrational. They argue that this view is held by a number of people, including people who the authors label “postmodernists” and the Strong Programme in the sociology of science, and that it is illogical, impractical, and dangerous.
Write a customer review.
The discussion intelectualds polarized between impassioned supporters and equally impassioned opponents of Sokal [ He then writes of his hope that in the future this work is pursued more seriously and with dignity at the level of the issues involved. Lists with Intelwctuales Book. Jitney rated it it was amazing May 06, In Jacques Derrida ‘s response, “Sokal and Bricmont Aren’t Serious,” first published in Le MondeDerrida writes that the Sokal hoax is rather “sad,” not only because Alan Sokal’s name is now linked primarily to a hoaxnot to sciencebut also because the chance to reflect seriously on this issue has been ruined for a broad public forum that deserves better.
To see what your friends thought of this book, impostuas sign up.
Fashionable Nonsense – Wikidata
Libro negro de la nueva izquierda. They pick and choose where to use science itself, keeping it away from whatever indefensible pet theories they have be it aliens or gods. After all, if there is intekectuales right way of knowing, and science is just one impostuas among many – well, who’s to say universal health care would help people? Limiting her considerations to physics, science hystorian Mara Beller  maintained that it was not entirely fair to blame contemporary postmodern philosophers for drawing nonsensical conclusions from quantum physics which they did dosince many such conclusions were drawn by some of the leading quantum physicists themselves, such as Bohr or Heisenberg when they ventured into philosophy.
Return to Book Page.
Más allá de las imposturas intelectuales
Number Theory for Computing 2nd ed. Postmodernism Philosophy of science. Sokal and Bricmont claim that they do not intend to analyze postmodernist thought in general.
This latter point has been disputed by Arkady Plotnitsky one of the authors mentioned by Sokal in his original hoax. Richard Dawkinsin a review of this book, said regarding the discussion of Lacan: Responses imppsturas the scientific community were more supportive.